Re: [HACKERS] Patch for TNS services

2000-10-16 Thread Bruce Momjian
Patch applied. Can you send me the SGML diff? I will merge them in. > I've now prepared a polished and clean patch vs. 7.0.2. Who's gonna integrate > this patch in the CVS? I've no CVS access. > > The docs are another problem. I've installed jade and most other SGML stuff > here, but "make

Re: [HACKERS] Patch for TNS services

2000-10-07 Thread Alex Pilosov
Sorry for replying to the fairly old messages, but I just had time to open my pgsql mailbox: I would _love_ if your implementation can also implement TNS-style failover, i.e. having multiple /etc/pg_service.conf entries with same name. When replication is available, this will provide a efficient

Re: [HACKERS] Patch for TNS services

2000-09-22 Thread Mario Weilguni
I've now prepared a polished and clean patch vs. 7.0.2. Who's gonna integrate this patch in the CVS? I've no CVS access. The docs are another problem. I've installed jade and most other SGML stuff here, but "make user.html" fails with errors like : jade:user.sgml:5:55:W: cannot generate system

Re: [HACKERS] Patch for TNS services

2000-09-16 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Bruce Momjian writes: > Sounds like people want it. Can you polish it off, add SGML docs and > send it over? > > There's a config file /etc/pg_service.conf, having an entry like: Please check that the final patch uses a file in ${sysconfdir} that was specified at configure time, and not "/etc"

Re: [HACKERS] Patch for TNS services

2000-09-16 Thread Mario Weilguni
Am Die, 12 Sep 2000 schrieb Bruce Momjian: > Sounds like people want it. Can you polish it off, add SGML docs and > send it over? I prepared and tested a patch vs. 7.0.2, and it works fine. I've added another option which allows users to have their own service file in ~/.pg_service.conf, which