On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:30:09 -0300 Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> The other cases were already handled, so Andreas' initial patch was
> enough -- applied.
Thank you.
Bye
--
Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum
German PostgreSQL User Group
European PostgreSQL User Group - Board of
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera writes:
> > This was fixed on 1.84 of formatting.c for 8.0 (but not backpatched for
> > no apparent reason), which also changed some other stuff in that file.
> > The complete patch is attached.
>
> I dunno why I didn't back-patch that; feel free to do so. Better
Alvaro Herrera writes:
> This was fixed on 1.84 of formatting.c for 8.0 (but not backpatched for
> no apparent reason), which also changed some other stuff in that file.
> The complete patch is attached.
I dunno why I didn't back-patch that; feel free to do so. Better do the
whole thing, because
Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:55:32 +0100 Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:
>
> > I tracked the problem done to the function str_numth() in
> > src/backend/utils/adt/formatting.c. The fix (attached) is easy: i
> > stole the function code from the latest 8.
Hello all,
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:55:32 +0100 Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:
> I tracked the problem done to the function str_numth() in
> src/backend/utils/adt/formatting.c. The fix (attached) is easy: i
> stole the function code from the latest 8.0 version which looks fare
> more sane in handl
Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum writes:
> I tracked the problem done to the function str_numth() in
> src/backend/utils/adt/formatting.c. The fix (attached) is easy: i
> stole the function code from the latest 8.0 version which looks fare
> more sane in handling the string pointers.
I think you attached
Hello,
even if 7.4 is almost at the end of it's lifetime i found a bug/problem
on a fairly new laptop (not surprising: during upgrade tests). All
timestamp regression tests failed, only "th" was emitted.
I tracked the problem done to the function str_numth() in
src/backend/utils/adt/formatting.c
