Joe Conway wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
[ Joe, would you review this? ]
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
The pa
Bruce Momjian wrote:
[ Joe, would you review this? ]
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
The patch itself is pret
[ Joe, would you review this? ]
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
---
Tom Lane wrote:
> Jonathan Beit-Aharon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > if (!conn)
> >
> > DBLINK_CONN_NOT_AVAIL;
>
> Could we see this in a less broken format?
Here is the patch in text format.
--
Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman
Jonathan Beit-Aharon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> if (!conn)
>
> DBLINK_CONN_NOT_AVAIL;
> +
> + if (rcon)
> +
> rcon->remoteTrFlag = (PQtransactionStatus(conn) !=
> PQTRANS_IDLE);
>
> - res = PQexec(conn, "BEGIN");
> - if (PQresultStatus(r
Hi,
I'm not a member of this list (yet), so please
CC me on responses and
discussion.
The patch below seems to be completion of work already
started, because the boolean remoteTrFlag was already defined, and all
I had to add was its setting and two references.
I hope someone will find it us
