On 7/2/08, Josh Berkus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just in case anyone was unclear, this is how we're trying things for
this commitfest:
1) Starting RIGHT NOW, reviewers should claim review items they are
interested in or specially qualified to review.
2) This weekend, I will check for
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Marko Kreen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't understand one aspect - if I'm unfamiliar with Postgres
and cannot do full review or am familiar but cannot do full
review due to time aspects but still want to throw some quick
comments, should I register on wiki?
On 7/2/08, Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Marko Kreen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't understand one aspect - if I'm unfamiliar with Postgres
and cannot do full review or am familiar but cannot do full
review due to time aspects but still want to
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Marko Kreen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/2/08, Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Marko Kreen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't understand one aspect - if I'm unfamiliar with Postgres
and cannot do full review or am familiar
Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Marko Kreen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The comments should go to wiki? Not mailing list?
It's a fine line (and slightly bendy line) - but simple comments can
go on the wiki, discussion should go to the list and be
Hackers,
Just in case anyone was unclear, this is how we're trying things for
this commitfest:
1) Starting RIGHT NOW, reviewers should claim review items they are
interested in or specially qualified to review.
2) This weekend, I will check for all items which don't have one or
more reviewers
Hackers,
Just in case anyone was unclear, this is how we're trying things for
this commitfest:
1) Starting RIGHT NOW, reviewers should claim review items they are
interested in or specially qualified to review.
2) This weekend, I will check for all items which don't have one or
more reviewers
