Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am Freitag, 7. Januar 2005 17:20 schrieb Tom Lane:
>> Could you post a diff against what we have now?
> Attached.
Looks ok to me.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP
Am Freitag, 7. Januar 2005 17:20 schrieb Tom Lane:
> > Does anyone object to installing the new mkinstalldirs? I took the
> > latest version from the automake CVS. The important change was
> > apparently to use mkdir -p only with GNU mkdir.
>
> Could you post a diff against what we have now?
Att
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does anyone object to installing the new mkinstalldirs? I took the latest
> version from the automake CVS. The important change was apparently to use
> mkdir -p only with GNU mkdir.
Could you post a diff against what we have now?
Am Freitag, 7. Januar 2005 13:10 schrieb Honda Shigehiro:
> This installdirs are worked well. 'make install' succeeds without
> modifying Makefiles.
Does anyone object to installing the new mkinstalldirs? I took the latest
version from the automake CVS. The important change was apparently to us
Hello,
This installdirs are worked well. 'make install' succeeds without
modifying Makefiles.
Thank you.
regards,
--
Shigehiro Honda
From: Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Porting/platforms/buildfarm open issues
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:5
Am Donnerstag, 6. Januar 2005 16:30 schrieb Honda Shigehiro:
> 2) mkdir?
> Due to odd behavior of 'mkdir -p' command, I got below error when 'make
> install': mkdir -p -- /usr/local/pgsql/bin /usr/local/pgsql/share
> mkdir: cannot create /usr/local/pgsql/share.
> /usr/local/pgsql/share: File ex
Honda Shigehiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, I need a patch to build:
> bash-2.05b$ diff Makefile.osf.DIST Makefile.osf
> 4c4
> < rpath = -Wl,-rpath -Wl,$(rpathdir)
> ---
> > rpath = -rpath $(rpathdir)
OK; this simply reverts a cosmetic change I made awhile ago. Evidently
that wasn't a good
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Second, we have regressions (vs. 7.4) on the following platforms:
Linux Alpha (buildfarm hare)
This was apparently an old Alpha chip, and Jim was going to try on a
more modern machine not known to have FP problems. So take this result
with many grains of salt.
cheers
Shridhar Daithankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thursday 06 Jan 2005 3:52 pm, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> First, we still do not have any test with 8.0 on the following platforms:
>>
>> HP-UX
> All the 96 tests are passed on RC3. I can rerun the tests with additional
> configure flags if req
Hello.
From: Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [HACKERS] Porting/platforms/buildfarm open issues
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:22:56 +0100
> Tru64 UNIX
I tried RC3 on Tru64 box with cc(Compaq C V6.1-011). There are some errors
to build and install. All tests (make installc
On Thursday 06 Jan 2005 3:52 pm, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> First, we still do not have any test with 8.0 on the following platforms:
>
> HP-UX
All the 96 tests are passed on RC3. I can rerun the tests with additional
configure flags if required..But I can not install anything new on HP-UX
machin
First, we still do not have any test with 8.0 on the following platforms:
HP-UX
IRIX
Tru64 UNIX
SCO OpenServer
Second, we have regressions (vs. 7.4) on the following platforms:
Linux Alpha (buildfarm hare)
Linux ARM (see
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-01/msg00094.php)
Other
12 matches
Mail list logo
