Applied.
---
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Dave Byrne wrote:
Beginning with commit 002c105a0706bd1c1e939fe0f47ecdceeae6c52d
pg_upgrade will fail if there are orphaned temp tables in the current
database with the message 'old
Dave Byrne wrote:
Beginning with commit 002c105a0706bd1c1e939fe0f47ecdceeae6c52d
pg_upgrade will fail if there are orphaned temp tables in the current
database with the message 'old and new databases postgres have a
different number of relations'
On line 41 of pg_upgrade/info.c pg_upgrade
On 08/11/2011 12:02 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On ons, 2011-08-10 at 18:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Dave Byrnedby...@mdb.com writes:
Attached is a patch that skips orphaned temporary relations in pg_upgrade if they
are lingering around. It works for 9.0 - 9.1 upgrades, however I wasn't able
On ons, 2011-08-10 at 18:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Dave Byrne dby...@mdb.com writes:
Attached is a patch that skips orphaned temporary relations in pg_upgrade
if they are lingering around. It works for 9.0 - 9.1 upgrades, however I
wasn't able to tell when pg_class.relistemp was added so
Beginning with commit 002c105a0706bd1c1e939fe0f47ecdceeae6c52d
pg_upgrade will fail if there are orphaned temp tables in the current
database with the message 'old and new databases postgres have a
different number of relations'
On line 41 of pg_upgrade/info.c pg_upgrade checks that the number
Dave Byrne dby...@mdb.com writes:
Beginning with commit 002c105a0706bd1c1e939fe0f47ecdceeae6c52d
pg_upgrade will fail if there are orphaned temp tables in the current
database with the message 'old and new databases postgres have a
different number of relations'
On line 41 of
.
Thanks
Dave Byrne
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:t...@sss.pgh.pa.us]
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 12:29 PM
To: Dave Byrne
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Bruce Momjian
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Possible Bug in pg_upgrade
Dave Byrne dby...@mdb.com writes:
Beginning
Dave Byrne dby...@mdb.com writes:
Attached is a patch that skips orphaned temporary relations in pg_upgrade if
they are lingering around. It works for 9.0 - 9.1 upgrades, however I wasn't
able to tell when pg_class.relistemp was added so if it was unavailable in
versions prior to 9.0 an
