I assume all the pgxs changes have been applied by Tom.
---
Fabien COELHO wrote:
>
> Dear Thomas,
>
> > I'm trying to change the Makefile system for PL/Java so that it uses PGXS
> > instead of compiling using a complete Po
Dear Thomas,
ifdef PGXS
override CPPFLAGS := -I$(includedir_server)
-I$(includedir_server)/port/win32 -I$(includedir_internal) $(CPPFLAGS)
else # not PGXS
Why can't you #include "port/win32/some_file.h" which would (I think)
avoid the issue without adding a win32 specific -I to all architectu
Fabien,
ifdef PGXS
override CPPFLAGS := -I$(includedir_server)
-I$(includedir_server)/port/win32 -I$(includedir_internal) $(CPPFLAGS)
else # not PGXS
...
Why can't you #include "port/win32/some_file.h" which would (I think)
avoid the issue without adding a win32 specific -I to all architec
Dear Thomas,
> There's quite a few issues. Here's what I had to do in order to get my stuff
> working. I don't think it's any use for me to submit changes in form of a
> patch at this point since pgxs seems to be a bit on the drawing table still.
Well, it is supposed to work;-)
"pgxs" is just a
Fabien,
There's quite a few issues. Here's what I had to do in order to get my
stuff working. I don't think it's any use for me to submit changes in
form of a patch at this point since pgxs seems to be a bit on the
drawing table still. I started another thread that was not win32 related
also wit
Dear Thomas,
> I'm trying to change the Makefile system for PL/Java so that it uses PGXS
> instead of compiling using a complete PostgreSQL source tree. As it turns
> out, the directory "include/port/win32" is not present in the PostgreSQL
> binary installation. Without it, it's not possible to c
I'm trying to change the Makefile system for PL/Java so that it uses
PGXS instead of compiling using a complete PostgreSQL source tree. As it
turns out, the directory "include/port/win32" is not present in the
PostgreSQL binary installation. Without it, it's not possible to compile
on win32.
D
