Hello
I am thinking about implementation of median function. This function
should be implemented in two ways:
a) direct entering an ORDER BY clause for median funcall in gram.y
b) general support for preordered aggregates.
I prefer plan b, because there are more similar aggregates - like
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
I am thinking about implementation of median function. This function
should be implemented in two ways:
a) direct entering an ORDER BY clause for median funcall in gram.y
b) general support for preordered aggregates.
I prefer plan b, because
2009/12/20 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
I am thinking about implementation of median function. This function
should be implemented in two ways:
a) direct entering an ORDER BY clause for median funcall in gram.y
b) general support for preordered
Hi from a real user :)
Le 20 déc. 2009 à 22:08, Tom Lane a écrit :
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
b) general support for preordered aggregates.
I think that we've already expanded the capabilities of aggregates
a great deal for 8.5, and we should let it sit as-is for a
Dimitri Fontaine dfonta...@hi-media.com writes:
Le 20 déc. 2009 à 22:08, Tom Lane a écrit :
Another risk is that features added now might preclude adding others
later.
Now, I have no idea if augmenting the aggregate properties with an optional
sorting step is the right approach, but it
Pavel == Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
2009/12/20 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
I think that we've already expanded the capabilities of aggregates
a great deal for 8.5, and we should let it sit as-is for a release
or two and see what the real user demand is for additional
2009/12/20 Andrew Gierth and...@tao11.riddles.org.uk:
Pavel == Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
2009/12/20 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
I think that we've already expanded the capabilities of aggregates
a great deal for 8.5, and we should let it sit as-is for a release
