On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 10:03:39AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas writes:
> > On 10/18/2016 04:13 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> There's a smoking gun in the postmaster log:
> >> 2016-10-18 09:10:34.547 EDT [18502] LOG: wrong key in cancel request for
> >> process 18491
>
> > Ok, I've re
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>> The cleanest fix might be to change those various "long" variables
>> to uint32. You'd have to think about how to handle the ntohl/htonl
>> calls that are used on them, though.
>
> Or actually, no, you wouldn't have to think very har
I wrote:
> The cleanest fix might be to change those various "long" variables
> to uint32. You'd have to think about how to handle the ntohl/htonl
> calls that are used on them, though.
Or actually, no, you wouldn't have to think very hard. I was supposing
that those calls were declared to traff
Heikki Linnakangas writes:
> On 10/18/2016 04:13 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> There's a smoking gun in the postmaster log:
>> 2016-10-18 09:10:34.547 EDT [18502] LOG: wrong key in cancel request for
>> process 18491
> Ok, I've reverted that commit for now. It clearly needs more thought,
> because of
On 10/18/2016 04:13 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Magnus Hagander writes:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 1:00 AM, Vladimir Sitnikov <
sitnikov.vladi...@gmail.com> wrote:
The test executes "select pg_sleep(10)" and tries to cancel it. In recent
master builds, cancel seems to be ignored, and the statement lasts
Magnus Hagander writes:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 1:00 AM, Vladimir Sitnikov <
> sitnikov.vladi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The test executes "select pg_sleep(10)" and tries to cancel it. In recent
>> master builds, cancel seems to be ignored, and the statement lasts for 10
>> seconds.
> My guess is
>What platform does the postgres server run on?
Ubuntu
OS name: "linux", version: "3.19.0-66-generic", arch: "amd64", family:
"unix"
2016-10-18 11:05 GMT+03:00 Magnus Hagander :
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 1:00 AM, Vladimir Sitnikov <
> sitnikov.vladi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> In pgj
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 1:00 AM, Vladimir Sitnikov <
sitnikov.vladi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In pgjdbc we have regular regression testing against "build from
> master" PostgreSQL, and recent master builds fail for "statement cancel"
> test.
>
> The PostgreSQL as of Mon Oct 17 00:09:39 UTC 20
Hi,
In pgjdbc we have regular regression testing against "build from
master" PostgreSQL, and recent master builds fail for "statement cancel"
test.
The PostgreSQL as of Mon Oct 17 00:09:39 UTC 2016 was fine, then "statement
cancel" started to fail.
The test executes "select pg_sleep(10)" and trie
