> -- Forwarded message --
> From: David Fetter
> To: Andrew Dunstan
> Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:31:41 -0700
> Subject: Re: REGRESS_OPTS versus MSVC build scripts
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 02:15:48PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>>
>> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>>
>>
>> Here's an un
Andrew Dunstan writes:
> David Fetter wrote:
>> This section is probably better done with Tie::File.
> You keep pushing that barrow. I ripped Tie::File OUT of the buildfarm -
> it is not universally available. Besides, as the perl world says, TIMTOWTDI.
Also, there's some value in having the co
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
+ sub fetchRegressOpts
+ {
+ my $handle;
+ open($handle,"
I think you should try GNUmakefile first, Makefile second. That's what
gmake does.
Hmm, ok. It doesn't matter much in the present case - none of the
contrib modules a
David Fetter wrote:
+ my $handle;
+ open($handle,"
This section is probably better done with Tie::File.
You keep pushing that barrow. I ripped Tie::File OUT of the buildfarm -
it is not universally available. Besides, as the perl world says, TIMTOWTDI.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> + sub fetchRegressOpts
> + {
> + my $handle;
> + open($handle," + || open($handle," + || die "Could not open Makefile";
I think you should try GNUmakefile first, Makefile second. That's what
gmake does.
--
Alvaro Herrera
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 02:15:48PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>>
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I believe (but won't be able to prove for another few hours) that the
>>> reason the MSVC buildfarm members are failing on contrib/unaccent,
>>> as seen here:
>>> http://www.pg
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
I believe (but won't be able to prove for another few hours) that the
reason the MSVC buildfarm members are failing on contrib/unaccent,
as seen here:
http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=mastodon&dt=2009-08-18%2013:00:00
is that they are
Tom Lane wrote:
I believe (but won't be able to prove for another few hours) that the
reason the MSVC buildfarm members are failing on contrib/unaccent,
as seen here:
http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=mastodon&dt=2009-08-18%2013:00:00
is that they are not running the test in a U
I believe (but won't be able to prove for another few hours) that the
reason the MSVC buildfarm members are failing on contrib/unaccent,
as seen here:
http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=mastodon&dt=2009-08-18%2013:00:00
is that they are not running the test in a UTF8-encoded database
