On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 5:59 AM, Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net wrote:
* Peter Geoghegan (p...@heroku.com) wrote:
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 6:57 AM, Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net wrote:
[blah]
[re-blah]
[re-re-blah]
This patch has already been committed, but there are still many
concerns
* Peter Geoghegan (p...@heroku.com) wrote:
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 5:16 AM, Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net wrote:
next a message:
ERROR: new row violates WITH CHECK OPTION for data
DETAIL: Failing row contains (2014-10-05 12:28:30.79652, petr, 1000).
Doesn't inform about broken
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 6:57 AM, Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net wrote:
Are you sure this isn't just another example of an existing issue we
have wrt column privileges..? I'm working on a patch already to address
those issues in back-branches and will be considering what needs to be
done for
* Peter Geoghegan (p...@heroku.com) wrote:
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 6:57 AM, Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net wrote:
Are you sure this isn't just another example of an existing issue we
have wrt column privileges..? I'm working on a patch already to address
those issues in back-branches and
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 5:16 AM, Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net wrote:
next a message:
ERROR: new row violates WITH CHECK OPTION for data
DETAIL: Failing row contains (2014-10-05 12:28:30.79652, petr, 1000).
Doesn't inform about broken policy.
I'm guessing this is referring to the above
Hello
I am playing with RLS. I created simple table
table_data (inserted_by text, v integer);
I created two policies
create policy p1 on data with check (inserted_by = session_user);
create policy p2 on data with check (v between 10 and 1000);
I was surprised so p2 effectively disables p1;
* Pavel Stehule (pavel.steh...@gmail.com) wrote:
I am playing with RLS. I created simple table
table_data (inserted_by text, v integer);
I created two policies
create policy p1 on data with check (inserted_by = session_user);
create policy p2 on data with check (v between 10 and 1000);
2014-10-05 14:16 GMT+02:00 Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net:
* Pavel Stehule (pavel.steh...@gmail.com) wrote:
I am playing with RLS. I created simple table
table_data (inserted_by text, v integer);
I created two policies
create policy p1 on data with check (inserted_by =
Pavel,
* Pavel Stehule (pavel.steh...@gmail.com) wrote:
Please, can you show me some use case, where OR has bigger sense than AND?
[...]
You might also have a policy which applies to all roles and then a more
permissive policy for an 'admin' type of user- look at the Unix passwd
example
