On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Antonin Houska a...@cybertec.at wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Antonin Houska a...@cybertec.at wrote:
During my experiments with parallel
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Antonin Houska a...@cybertec.at wrote:
During my experiments with parallel workers I sometimes saw the master
and
worker process blocked. The
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Antonin Houska a...@cybertec.at wrote:
During my experiments with parallel workers I sometimes saw the master and
worker process blocked. The master uses shm queue to send data to the worker,
both sides nowait==false. I concluded that the following happened:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Antonin Houska a...@cybertec.at wrote:
During my experiments with parallel workers I sometimes saw the master and
worker process blocked. The master uses shm queue to send data to the
During my experiments with parallel workers I sometimes saw the master and
worker process blocked. The master uses shm queue to send data to the worker,
both sides nowait==false. I concluded that the following happened:
The worker process set itself as a receiver on the queue after
