Re: [HACKERS] Re: [HACKERS] ECPG dynamic cursor fix for UPDATE/DELETE ... WHERE CURRENT OF :curname

2010-08-05 Thread Tom Lane
Boszormenyi Zoltan writes: > Alvaro Herrera írta: >> Since we're still in the beta phase, it makes sense to apply the fix >> right now so that it appears in 9.0. No point in waiting for 9.0.1. > It boils down to the fact that Michael doesn't have too much time > and no one else knows ECPG in de

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [HACKERS] ECPG dynamic cursor fix for UPDATE/DELETE ... WHERE CURRENT OF :curname

2010-08-05 Thread Boszormenyi Zoltan
Alvaro Herrera írta: > Excerpts from Michael Meskes's message of jue ago 05 05:39:46 -0400 2010: > >> Sorry I thought Zoltan's explanation was clear enough. All prior ECPG >> versions were fine because dynamic cursor names were only added in 9.0. >> Apparently only this one place was missed. S

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [HACKERS] ECPG dynamic cursor fix for UPDATE/DELETE ... WHERE CURRENT OF :curname

2010-08-05 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Excerpts from Michael Meskes's message of jue ago 05 05:39:46 -0400 2010: > Sorry I thought Zoltan's explanation was clear enough. All prior ECPG > versions were fine because dynamic cursor names were only added in 9.0. > Apparently only this one place was missed. So this is a bug in the new > f

[HACKERS] Re: [HACKERS] ECPG dynamic cursor fix for UPDATE/DELETE ... WHERE CURRENT OF :curname

2010-08-05 Thread Michael Meskes
Sorry I thought Zoltan's explanation was clear enough. All prior ECPG versions were fine because dynamic cursor names were only added in 9.0. Apparently only this one place was missed. So this is a bug in the new feature, however not such a major one that it warrants the complete removal IMO. I'