[HACKERS] Re: A more useful way to split the distribution

2001-04-08 Thread Thomas Lockhart
> so it isn't a "fictitous crowd" that is going with the smaller chunks ... > its about 30% on a very small sample ... (back in town from the weekend, to see the PostgreSQL tarball ripped to shreds ;) Peter, I'm with you on this. If folks want to help support PostgreSQL by providing subset-tarba

Re: [HACKERS] Re: A more useful way to split the distribution

2001-04-08 Thread The Hermit Hacker
On Sun, 8 Apr 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > I wrote: > > > Since people suddenly seem to be suffering from bandwidth concerns I have > > devised a new distribution split to address this issue. I propose the > > following four sub-tarballs: > > > * postgresql-XXX.base.tar.gz3.3 MB > > *

[HACKERS] Re: A more useful way to split the distribution

2001-04-08 Thread Peter Eisentraut
I wrote: > Since people suddenly seem to be suffering from bandwidth concerns I have > devised a new distribution split to address this issue. I propose the > following four sub-tarballs: > * postgresql-XXX.base.tar.gz 3.3 MB > * postgresql-XXX.opt.tar.gz 1.7 MB > * postgresql-XXX.docs.tar.g