[HACKERS] Re: Oddity in error handling of constraint violation in ExecConstraints for partitioned tables

On 2017/07/18 16:20, Etsuro Fujita wrote: > On 2017/07/18 11:03, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 5:44 PM, Robert Haas wrote: >>> The posted patches look OK to me. Barring developments, I will commit >>> them on 2017-07-17, or send another update by then. >>

[HACKERS] Re: Oddity in error handling of constraint violation in ExecConstraints for partitioned tables

On 2017/07/18 11:03, Robert Haas wrote: On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 5:44 PM, Robert Haas wrote: The posted patches look OK to me. Barring developments, I will commit them on 2017-07-17, or send another update by then. Committed them. Thank you! Best regards, Etsuro

[HACKERS] Re: Oddity in error handling of constraint violation in ExecConstraints for partitioned tables

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 5:44 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > The posted patches look OK to me. Barring developments, I will commit > them on 2017-07-17, or send another update by then. Committed them. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise

[HACKERS] Re: Oddity in error handling of constraint violation in ExecConstraints for partitioned tables

On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 3:06 AM, Noah Misch wrote: > On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 06:47:26PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote: >> On 2017/07/06 16:06, Etsuro Fujita wrote: >> > Looks odd to me because the error message doesn't show any DETAIL info; >> > since the CTE query, which produces

[HACKERS] Re: Oddity in error handling of constraint violation in ExecConstraints for partitioned tables

On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 06:47:26PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote: > On 2017/07/06 16:06, Etsuro Fujita wrote: > > Looks odd to me because the error message doesn't show any DETAIL info; > > since the CTE query, which produces the message, is the same as the above > > query, the message should also be