Re: [HACKERS] Re: RC3 ... and rpms...

2001-04-07 Thread Lamar Owen
Franck Martin wrote: I have no idea if what I say is true about the PG distribution by PG people, but I have noticed than in the rpms of other distros the postgresql-devel rpms do not include all the .h files necessary to build PG extensions. For instance the rtree.h and itup.h and gist.h

Re: [HACKERS] Re: RC3 ... and rpms...

2001-04-07 Thread Lamar Owen
Karl DeBisschop wrote: In my experience so far, it is also noticably slower than gzip. It does work, and it is available. I have not yet been convinced that the space savings is worth the time lost. But ISTM this is a minor point. The official tarball is gzipped -- the RPM will use that until

Re: [HACKERS] Re: RC3 ... and rpms...

2001-04-07 Thread Karl DeBisschop
Franck Martin wrote: I have no idea if what I say is true about the PG distribution by PG people, but I have noticed than in the rpms of other distros the postgresql-devel rpms do not include all the .h files necessary to build PG extensions. For instance the rtree.h and itup.h and gist.h

Re: [HACKERS] Re: RC3 ... and rpms...

2001-04-07 Thread Lamar Owen
Karl DeBisschop wrote: Actually, since you can suppress installation of the docs with --nodocs, I would very much prefer to keep the html and text docs in the main RPM. Otherwise I have two directories in /usr/doc for one software suite. I'm researching how to get a subpackage to place docs