On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Tom Browder wrote:
>> [Removing all the other xposted lists -- don't do that!]
>
> Okay, sorry. I thought since the reply was pg-specific it would cut down
> noise.
I'm sorry I was unclear. I meant, I was removing all the others from
my reply and was saying not t
On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 7:03 AM, Greg Stark wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Greg Stark wrote:
>> Well. Not dealt with yet. I think it's more or less clear how to
>> tackle it using macros and builtins now but there's a lot of drudgery
>> work to actually rewrite all the checks. I have th
On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Greg Stark wrote:
> Well. Not dealt with yet. I think it's more or less clear how to
> tackle it using macros and builtins now but there's a lot of drudgery
> work to actually rewrite all the checks. I have the reports from Xi
> Wang's tool saved if anyone else wan
On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 12:41 PM, Tomas Vondra
wrote:
> And it was dealt with
Well. Not dealt with yet. I think it's more or less clear how to
tackle it using macros and builtins now but there's a lot of drudgery
work to actually rewrite all the checks. I have the reports from Xi
Wang's tool saved
