Magnus Hagander wrote:
If you change the text file, I will see the CVS update and update the
HTML --- I will never lose a change because my CVS sees your changes.
That seems like a lot of extra work that should be unnecessary.
I asked before for general reactions, so I will now turn that
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Magnus Hagander wrote:
Let's move the TODO list to the wiki.
We need it to do a few things:
o We need to be able to pull a text and HTML copies for tarballs
Why? Even if we think the TODO list needs to appear in tarballs (which
is hardly a
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Magnus Hagander wrote:
Let's move the TODO list to the wiki.
We need it to do a few things:
o We need to be able to pull a text and HTML copies for tarballs
Why? Even if we think the TODO list needs to appear in tarballs
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
Personally I think it would be just fine if we had only the wiki copy
and forgot about shipping it in tarballs.
The problem with not shipping the TODO file at all is that TODO gives
users a list of all known bugs/missing features in
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
Personally I think it would be just fine if we had only the wiki copy
and forgot about shipping it in tarballs.
The problem with not shipping the TODO file at all is that TODO gives
users a list of all known
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 3:32 PM, Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
This seems to me to be nonsense. You've never maintained the
back-branch versions of the TODO list, so they're out of date anyway
--- ie, they don't account for problems discovered post-release.
Dave Page wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 3:32 PM, Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
This seems to me to be nonsense. You've never maintained the
back-branch versions of the TODO list, so they're out of date anyway
--- ie, they don't account for problems
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:10:27 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is a best effort with our limited resources.
Should we outsource it? It is user-facing :-p
If it was a service we could use for free, we could consider it.
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:39:06 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it was a service we could use for free, we could consider it.
https://launchpad.net/
http://www.sourceforge.net/
Those
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:10:27 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is a best effort with our limited resources.
Should we outsource it? It is user-facing :-p
If it was a service we could use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:39:06 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it was a service we could use for free, we could consider it.
https://launchpad.net/
http://www.sourceforge.net/
Those are a step backward --- they don't
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Probably the biggest missing feature for the TODO is the ability to
summarize, group into labeled sections and subsections, and the ability
to move items around, with URL links to more detail. Effectively that
is all the TODO list is.
Oh, like a Wiki page.
--
Alvaro
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:32:16AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
Personally I think it would be just fine if we had only the wiki copy
and forgot about shipping it in tarballs.
The problem with not shipping the
Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:32:16AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
Personally I think it would be just fine if we had only the wiki copy
and forgot about shipping it in tarballs.
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 02:10:08PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:32:16AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
Personally I think it would be just fine if we had only
15 matches
Mail list logo
