On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 2:41 AM, Peter Eisentraut
wrote:
> On 7/2/17 20:28, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> I was going to hold this back for PG11, but since we're now doing some
>>> other tweaks in pg_ctl, it might be useful to add this too. Thoughts?
>>
>> The use of 0 as exit code for the new promot
On 7/2/17 20:28, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> I was going to hold this back for PG11, but since we're now doing some
>> other tweaks in pg_ctl, it might be useful to add this too. Thoughts?
>
> The use of 0 as exit code for the new promote -w if timeout is reached
> looks like an open item to me. Cl
On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 4:47 AM, Peter Eisentraut
wrote:
> On 5/1/17 12:19, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> However: Failure to complete promotion within the waiting time does not
>> lead to an error exit, so you will not get a failure if the promotion
>> does not finish. This is probably a mistake. L
On 5/1/17 12:19, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 4/27/17 08:41, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> +$node_slave->promote;
>> +$node_slave->poll_query_until('postgres',
>> + "SELECT NOT pg_is_in_recovery()")
>> + or die "Timed out while waiting for promotion of standby";
>>
>> This reminds me that we should
