On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 09:05:38PM +1300, David Rowley wrote:
> As for signed vs unsigned, I've not looked at all of the places where
> MAXALIGN is used, but I just assumed it was for memory addresses, if this
> is the case then I'm confused why we'd ever want a negative valued memory
> address?
T
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 1:39 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 1:14 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 03:23:30PM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> >> On 2013-10-10 08:59:47 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Andres Freund
> wrote:
> >> >
On 2013-10-17 12:33:45 -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> > But if we're bent on minimizing the use of 64-bit arithmetic on 32-bit
> > systems, then presumably I should instead go back and retrofit that
> > patch to use Size rather than uint64 to represent the size of a
> > segment. But then I have two co
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
>> But if we're bent on minimizing the use of 64-bit arithmetic on 32-bit
>> systems, then presumably I should instead go back and retrofit that
>> patch to use Size rather than uint64 to represent the size of a
>> segment. But then I have two c
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 08:39:56AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 1:14 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 03:23:30PM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> >> On 2013-10-10 08:59:47 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> > I'd be inclined to make the computation unconditionally
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 1:14 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 03:23:30PM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
>> On 2013-10-10 08:59:47 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Andres Freund
>> > wrote:
>> > > Do you have a better alternative? Making the computation u
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 03:23:30PM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2013-10-10 08:59:47 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Andres Freund
> > wrote:
> > > Do you have a better alternative? Making the computation unconditionally
> > > 64bit will have a runtime overhead an