Re: [HACKERS] Re: temp-table-related failure in regression tests

2001-06-19 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > We can move the is_temp_relname define if you wish but with one hack > already in rel.h for get_temp_rel_by_physicalname(), I am not excited > about adding another to rel.h. In fact, is_temp_relname needs > PG_TEMP_REL_PREFIX so we would have to move it

[HACKERS] Re: temp-table-related failure in regression tests

2001-06-18 Thread Tom Lane
I wrote: > Is anyone else seeing this with current CVS, or is it my own breakage? Ah, the problem is RelationGetRelationName didn't know about the new temprel naming convention. I quick-hacked rel.h to fix this, but we need a better solution. I don't much like having rel.h include temprel.h ---