On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Marti Raudsepp ma...@juffo.org wrote:
Yeah, I'm still working on addressing the comments from your last email.
Haven't had much time to work on it for the last 2 weeks, but I hope
to finish most of it this weekend.
Since the updated patch seems never to have
Marti Raudsepp ma...@juffo.org writes:
Per Tom's request, I split out this refactoring from my CacheExpr patch.
Basically I'm just centralizing the eval_const_expressions_mutator()
call on function arguments, from multiple different places to a single
location. Without this, it would be a lot
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 01:17, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I've applied a slightly-modified version of this after reconciling it
with the protransform fixes.
Cool, thanks!
I assume you are going to submit a rebased
version of the main CacheExpr patch?
Yeah, I'm still working on
Hi list,
Per Tom's request, I split out this refactoring from my CacheExpr patch.
Basically I'm just centralizing the eval_const_expressions_mutator()
call on function arguments, from multiple different places to a single
location. Without this, it would be a lot harder to implement argument
