Tom Lane wrote:
> Hannu Krosing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Once more:
> > I would like to get at least some answer, why my patch for enabling
> > concurrent VACUUM was left out from 8.1.
>
> You did not respond to this:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-08/msg00238.php
Yep
Hannu Krosing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Once more:
> I would like to get at least some answer, why my patch for enabling
> concurrent VACUUM was left out from 8.1.
You did not respond to this:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-08/msg00238.php
regards,
Once more:
I would like to get at least some answer, why my patch for enabling
concurrent VACUUM was left out from 8.1.
It was submitted well in time, and there was only minimal amount of
discussion of an earlier patch,and AFAIK I addressed all the issues
raised there.
I really hate to have to
I have started compiling the release notes for 8.1. I should be done by
Friday.
--
Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup.
