Re: [HACKERS] Request for additional SPI functions.

2004-02-12 Thread Bruce Momjian
Thomas Hallgren wrote: > I will submit a patch. As soon as I have read the developers FAQ and learned > how this is done :-) > > B.T.W. I needed one additional function. Do you think I should submit it > too? This function copies some behavior found in the SPI_cursor_open. If > submitted, I'd sugg

Re: [HACKERS] Request for additional SPI functions.

2004-02-12 Thread Thomas Hallgren
MAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Thomas Hallgren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 23:00 Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for additional SPI functions. > > This seems like a reasonable request. Care to submit a patch? > >

Re: [HACKERS] Request for additional SPI functions.

2004-02-11 Thread Bruce Momjian
This seems like a reasonable request. Care to submit a patch? --- Thomas Hallgren wrote: > Short story: > I need two new functions in the Server Programming Interface (SPI) when > mapping an ExecutionPlan to a Java prepared

[HACKERS] Request for additional SPI functions.

2004-01-12 Thread Thomas Hallgren
Short story: I need two new functions in the Server Programming Interface (SPI) when mapping an ExecutionPlan to a Java prepared statement (pljava project). Long story: My problem is that once a plan is prepared and I want to execute it, I send an array of java objects for the arguments. The SPI_c