Re: [HACKERS] Review: [PL/pgSQL] %TYPE and array declaration - second patch

2011-10-28 Thread Tom Lane
Pavel Stehule writes: > this is just small note about length of this patch. This patch was > significantly smaller then he solved problem with derivate types for > compound types - it should to solve problem described in this thread > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7634704/declare-variable-of

Re: [HACKERS] Review: [PL/pgSQL] %TYPE and array declaration - second patch

2011-10-27 Thread Pavel Stehule
Hello 2011/10/28 Tom Lane : > Pavel Stehule writes: >> there is final Wojciech's patch > this is just small note about length of this patch. This patch was significantly smaller then he solved problem with derivate types for compound types - it should to solve problem described in this thread h

Re: [HACKERS] Review: [PL/pgSQL] %TYPE and array declaration - second patch

2011-10-27 Thread Tom Lane
Pavel Stehule writes: > there is final Wojciech's patch I looked this over a little bit, but I don't see an answer to the question I put on the commitfest entry: why is this being done in plpgsql, and not somewhere in the core code? The core has also got the concept of %TYPE, and could stand to