Re: [HACKERS] Review Report: propose to include 3 new functions into intarray and intagg

2008-09-25 Thread Dmitry Koterov
No problem, I have time for clearing. But are these functions guaranteed to be included in the contrib? If there is no guarantee, seems the time of clearing will be wasted. (5 years ago I have already cleaned one open-source library on demand and after that it was not approved for PEAR repository,

Re: [HACKERS] Review Report: propose to include 3 new functions into intarray and intagg

2008-09-15 Thread Markus Wanner
Hi, sorry for not having completed this review, yet. As you are obviously looking at the patch as well, I'll try to quickly write down my points so far. Trying to compile the intarray module, I now receive an error: error: ‘INT4OID’ undeclared (first use in this function) That can be solved

Re: [HACKERS] Review Report: propose to include 3 new functions into intarray and intagg

2008-09-15 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
Markus Wanner wrote: Dmitry Koterov wrote: But, what about intarray patch? Does somebody plan to review it? I'd prefer to include it too. If you approve, I'll correct the code style in intarray contrib patch too. I've already volunteered for reviewing it as well. I just felt like splitting t

Re: [HACKERS] Review Report: propose to include 3 new functions into intarray and intagg

2008-09-07 Thread Markus Wanner
Hi, Dmitry Koterov wrote: I'll correct everything and send a patch in a couple of days. Cool, thank you. Are you completely sure that this patch will be included? Uh.. I'm not a committer, but I'm pretty sure your patch has good chances. I can help with SGML documentation, if you want. B

Re: [HACKERS] Review Report: propose to include 3 new functions into intarray and intagg

2008-09-07 Thread Dmitry Koterov
OK, thank you for your review. I'll correct everything and send a patch in a couple of days. Are you completely sure that this patch will be included? If not, seems the work of the patch standartization has much lower priority, and I will not hurry so much. But, what about intarray patch? Does so

Re: [HACKERS] Review Report: propose to include 3 new functions into intarray and intagg

2008-09-06 Thread Tom Lane
Markus Wanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Submission review: we generally prefer having patches archived on our > mailing lists, so please just send future patches or revisions of this > patch to our lists (I prefer -hackers, but probably -patches is still > the official one). Please. But -patc

[HACKERS] Review Report: propose to include 3 new functions into intarray and intagg

2008-09-06 Thread Markus Wanner
Hi, this is my first "official" review. I've tried to follow the "Review a patch" guidelines from the wiki - thanks Simon, that was pretty helpful. This review covers only the intagg additions. Dmitry Koterov wrote: Here are these functions with detailed documentation: http://en.dklab.ru/lib/d