Hi,
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 5:27 AM, Tom Lanet...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com writes:
I revised the patch according to the suggestion.
Applied with some mostly-cosmetic editorial work.
Thank you very much!
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE
Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com writes:
But there is one issue; the extra search is always required to send a notify
interrupt. This is because pg_listener doesn't have a backend ID and we
cannot pass it to SendProcSignal. In order to solve this issue, we should
newly add backend ID field
Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com writes:
I revised the patch according to the suggestion.
Applied with some mostly-cosmetic editorial work.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Tom Lanet...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com writes:
I revised the patch according to the suggestion.
Applied with some mostly-cosmetic editorial work.
regards, tom lane
Awesome, congrats.
...Robert
--
Sent
Hi,
I revised the patch according to the suggestion.
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Fujii Masaomasao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:09 AM, Tom Lanet...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I think you're making things more complicated when they should be
getting simpler.
It strikes me
