Tom Lane writes:
As an alternative syntax I can suggest
SET name TO value [ ON COMMIT RESET ];
Ugh. Why can't we stick with SET LOCAL?
SET LOCAL is already used for something else in the SQL standard. Not
sure if we'll ever implement that, but it's something to be concerned
about.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom Lane writes:
As an alternative syntax I can suggest
SET name TO value [ ON COMMIT RESET ];
Ugh. Why can't we stick with SET LOCAL?
SET LOCAL is already used for something else in the SQL standard. Not
sure if we'll ever implement that,
Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom Lane writes:
As an alternative syntax I can suggest
SET name TO value [ ON COMMIT RESET ];
Ugh. Why can't we stick with SET LOCAL?
SET LOCAL is already used for something else in the SQL standard. Not
sure if
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom Lane writes:
As an alternative syntax I can suggest
SET name TO value [ ON COMMIT RESET ];
Ugh. Why can't we stick with SET LOCAL?
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As an alternative syntax I can suggest
SET name TO value [ ON COMMIT RESET ];
Ugh. Why can't we stick with SET LOCAL?
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have
