Tom Lane wrote:
>
> "Hiroshi Inoue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I already mentioned an opinion in 2001/09/08.
> > Both the command counters and the snapshots in a
> > function should advance except the leading SELECT
> > statements.
>
> I do not like the idea of treating the first se
"Hiroshi Inoue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I'm not sure exactly what you mean by "stable" here.
> Wasn't it you who defined *stable* as
> Cachable within a single command: given fixed input values, the
> result will not change if the function were to be repeatedly evaluated
> within a
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> Hiroshi Inoue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Sorry, I don't understand ...
>
> > Let t be a table which is defined as
> > create table t (id serial primary key, dt text);
> > Then is the following
Hiroshi Inoue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Sorry, I don't understand ...
> Let t be a table which is defined as
> create table t (id serial primary key, dt text);
> Then is the following function *stable* ?
> create function f1(int4) returns text as
> '
> declare
> t
