Uh, this patch was never applied. Do we want it?
---
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 03:39:14PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Andres Freund 2014-06-12 <20140612094112.gz8...@alap3.anarazel.de>
> > > * Make initdb determine the
Hi,
On 2014-06-12 11:08:35 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 5:41 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> >> > With regard to Andres' proposal, I'm not that keen on setting
> >> > dynamic_shared_memory_type='none' by default.
> >
> > Note that I'm not proposing to disable the whole thing. Ju
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 5:41 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
>> > With regard to Andres' proposal, I'm not that keen on setting
>> > dynamic_shared_memory_type='none' by default.
>
> Note that I'm not proposing to disable the whole thing. Just that a
> unset dynamic_shared_memory_type doesn't configure d
Re: Andres Freund 2014-06-12 <20140612094112.gz8...@alap3.anarazel.de>
> > * Make initdb determine the best shm type for this platform and write
> > it into postgresql.conf as it does now.
> > * If no dynamic_shared_memory_type is found in the config, default to
> > "none".
> > * Modify the thr
Hi,
On 2014-06-12 11:07:31 +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Robert Haas 2014-05-28
>
> > On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Maciek Sakrejda
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 12:24 AM, Andres Freund
> > > wrote:
> > >> Any chance you're using a 9.3 configuration file instead of the one
[redirecting to -hackers]
Re: Robert Haas 2014-05-28
> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Maciek Sakrejda wrote:
> > On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 12:24 AM, Andres Freund
> > wrote:
> >> Any chance you're using a 9.3 configuration file instead of the one
> >> generated by initdb?
> >> dynamic_shared_m
