Re: [HACKERS] Shrink volume of default make output

2017-01-07 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 03:37:04PM -0600, Jim Nasby wrote: > The recent thread about compiler warnings got me thinking about how it's > essentially impossible to notice warnings with default make output. Perhaps > everyone just uses make -s by default, though that's a bit annoying since > you get n

Re: [HACKERS] Shrink volume of default make output

2017-01-03 Thread Craig Ringer
On 3 January 2017 at 05:37, Jim Nasby wrote: > The recent thread about compiler warnings got me thinking about how it's > essentially impossible to notice warnings with default make output. Perhaps > everyone just uses make -s by default, though that's a bit annoying since > you get no output unle

Re: [HACKERS] Shrink volume of default make output

2017-01-03 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 1/2/17 4:37 PM, Jim Nasby wrote: > The recent thread about compiler warnings got me thinking about how it's > essentially impossible to notice warnings with default make output. I always build with -Werror. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development,

Re: [HACKERS] Shrink volume of default make output

2017-01-03 Thread Tom Lane
Jim Nasby writes: > The attached hack doesn't quiet everything, but makes a significant > difference, 1588 lines down to 622, with 347 being make -C (each of > those was a make -j4 after a make clean). > If folks are interested in this I can look at quieting the remaining > output. My intentio

Re: [HACKERS] Shrink volume of default make output

2017-01-03 Thread Jim Nasby
On 1/2/17 3:57 PM, Tom Lane wrote: Jim Nasby writes: The recent thread about compiler warnings got me thinking about how it's essentially impossible to notice warnings with default make output. Perhaps everyone just uses make -s by default, though that's a bit annoying since you get no output u

Re: [HACKERS] Shrink volume of default make output

2017-01-02 Thread Tom Lane
Jim Nasby writes: > The recent thread about compiler warnings got me thinking about how it's > essentially impossible to notice warnings with default make output. > Perhaps everyone just uses make -s by default, though that's a bit > annoying since you get no output unless something does warn (

[HACKERS] Shrink volume of default make output

2017-01-02 Thread Jim Nasby
The recent thread about compiler warnings got me thinking about how it's essentially impossible to notice warnings with default make output. Perhaps everyone just uses make -s by default, though that's a bit annoying since you get no output unless something does warn (and then you don't know wh