Thanks for the tips.
In our case, SIGINT makes more sense. I'll use that.
Regards
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 2:50 AM, fazool mein fazoolm...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I'll be modifying the code. In the walreceiver, I used
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 05:48:40PM -0700, fazool mein wrote:
Hi,
I want to shut down the server under certain conditions that can be
checked inside a backend process. For instance, while running
symmetric
Synchronous?
replication, if the primary dies, I want the the walreceiver to
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 9:44 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 9:48 AM, fazool mein fazoolm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I want to shut down the server under certain conditions that can be
checked
inside a backend process. For instance, while running
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 8:32 AM, David Fetter da...@fetter.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 05:48:40PM -0700, fazool mein wrote:
Hi,
I want to shut down the server under certain conditions that can be
checked inside a backend process. For instance, while running
symmetric
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 2:50 AM, fazool mein fazoolm...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I'll be modifying the code. In the walreceiver, I used the following to
send a shutdown to the postmaster:
kill(getppid(), SIGTERM);
You can use the global variable PostmasterPid instead of getppid.
There are three
Hi,
I want to shut down the server under certain conditions that can be checked
inside a backend process. For instance, while running symmetric replication,
if the primary dies, I want the the walreceiver to detect that and shutdown
the standby. The reason for shutdown is that I want to execute
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 9:48 AM, fazool mein fazoolm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I want to shut down the server under certain conditions that can be checked
inside a backend process. For instance, while running symmetric replication,
if the primary dies, I want the the walreceiver to detect that
