Magnus Hagander wrote:
In fact, on the last run of each, MinGW was by far the slowest and
Cygwin the fastest in the "make check" step. But there could be any
number of reasons for that, including extraneous activity on the VM host
that could have slowed the whole VM down.
Yeah. It does
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 11:01:26AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >>From what I can see MinGW regression is somewhat slower than MSVC (and
> >>even than Cygwin) on my buildfarm VM that runs all three, even though
> >>the latter two are rate limited by MAX_CONNECTION
Magnus Hagander wrote:
From what I can see MinGW regression is somewhat slower than MSVC (and
even than Cygwin) on my buildfarm VM that runs all three, even though
the latter two are rate limited by MAX_CONNECTIONS.
Uh, you're saying MSVC and Cygwin somehow differ from MingW?
I
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 08:43:01AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Gevik Babakhani wrote:
> >I am trying to run regression tests on both windows and RH.
> >It looks like that the tests on windows run slower than linux
> >using two machines with same hardware config.
> >
> >Is this known?
> >
Gevik Babakhani wrote:
I am trying to run regression tests on both windows and RH.
It looks like that the tests on windows run slower than linux
using two machines with same hardware config.
Is this known?
We need far more information than this before we can say much sensibly,
I thin
I am trying to run regression tests on both windows and RH.
It looks like that the tests on windows run slower than linux
using two machines with same hardware config.
Is this known?
Gevik Babakhani
PostgreSQL NL http://www.postgresql.nl
