On 17.04.2012 02:54, Michael Nolan wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Thom Brownt...@linux.com wrote:
Hi,
I've noticed that when using synchronous replication (on 9.2devel at
least), temporary tables become really slow:
Since temporary tables are only present until the session ends
On 17 April 2012 11:30, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
What happens is that we write the commit record if the transaction accesses
a temporary table, but we don't flush it. However, we still wait until it's
replicated to the standby. The obvious fix is to not wait
On 17.04.2012 14:10, Thom Brown wrote:
On 17 April 2012 11:30, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
What happens is that we write the commit record if the transaction accesses
a temporary table, but we don't flush it. However, we still wait until it's
replicated to the
On 17 April 2012 14:35, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
On 17.04.2012 14:10, Thom Brown wrote:
On 17 April 2012 11:30, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
What happens is that we write the commit record if the transaction
accesses
a
Hi,
I've noticed that when using synchronous replication (on 9.2devel at
least), temporary tables become really slow:
thom@test=# create temporary table temp_test (a text, b text);
CREATE TABLE
Time: 16.812 ms
thom@test=# SET synchronous_commit = 'local';
SET
Time: 2.739 ms
thom@test=# insert
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
Hi,
I've noticed that when using synchronous replication (on 9.2devel at
least), temporary tables become really slow:
Since temporary tables are only present until the session ends (or
possibly only until a commit), why are
