> Emil Briggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I was testing the spinlock patches that Tom Lane posted last month
> > on a quad opteron system running Suse 9.2 for x86_64.
>
> Exactly which patch is this, and against what base version of Postgres?
> Also, what's the hardware (no, "x86_64" isn't spec
Emil Briggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was testing the spinlock patches that Tom Lane posted last month
> on a quad opteron system running Suse 9.2 for x86_64.
Exactly which patch is this, and against what base version of Postgres?
Also, what's the hardware (no, "x86_64" isn't specific enough
I was testing the spinlock patches that Tom Lane posted last month
on a quad opteron system running Suse 9.2 for x86_64. The test sql and
database was from a real application of ours and I was interested in seeing
what effect the patches might have. The database is entirely RAM resident and
noth
