Ken Camann wrote:
In trying to port postgres to 64-bit Windows, I've encountered a
number of issues which may (or may not) affect other compilers. If
you followed the other thread, this is mostly a summary with a bit
more details so feel free to ignore it. Some of these may have some
minor
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ken Camann wrote:
When I try to compile postgres, I get 396 warnings. These come from
several different places:
1.) Most of the code involving strings requires a ILP32 or ILP64 to
not generate a warning. This means sizeof(int) == sizeof(size_t) ==
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 07:01:10PM -0400, Ken Camann wrote:
In trying to port postgres to 64-bit Windows, I've encountered a
number of issues which may (or may not) affect other compilers. If
you followed the other thread, this is mostly a summary with a bit
more details so feel free to
Am Mittwoch, 9. Juli 2008 schrieb Ken Camann:
In trying to port postgres to 64-bit Windows, I've encountered a
number of issues which may (or may not) affect other compilers.
Given that PostgreSQL runs fine on other 64-bit architectures, unsubstantiated
claims about other compilers being
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 3:35 AM, Martijn van Oosterhout
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just clarifying for myself: you are mostly listing theoretical problems
here, not actual I ran it and got regression failures problems, right?
Correct. This is why most of them point out that they are not
actually
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 03:03:48PM -0400, Ken Camann wrote:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 3:35 AM, Martijn van Oosterhout
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just clarifying for myself: you are mostly listing theoretical problems
here, not actual I ran it and got regression failures problems, right?
In trying to port postgres to 64-bit Windows, I've encountered a
number of issues which may (or may not) affect other compilers. If
you followed the other thread, this is mostly a summary with a bit
more details so feel free to ignore it. Some of these may have some
minor effects on other
