On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:13 AM, Fujii Masaomasao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
The attached latest patch provides this capability. You can easily set up the
synch rep according to the following procedure.
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/NTT%27s_Development_Projects#How_to_set_up_Synch_Rep
This patch
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 10:02 PM, Robert Haasrobertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Second, I am wondering whether Heikki feels that it would be useful to
assign round-robin reviewers for this patch, or whether he's going to
be the principal reviewer himself. We could assign either a reviewer
(or
Robert Haas escribió:
Second, I am wondering whether Heikki feels that it would be useful to
assign round-robin reviewers for this patch, or whether he's going to
be the principal reviewer himself. We could assign either a reviewer
(or reviewers) to the whole patch, or we could assign
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Robert Haasrobertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:13 AM, Fujii Masaomasao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
The attached latest patch provides this capability. You can easily set up the
synch rep according to the following procedure.
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Alvaro
Herreraalvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
WRT the signal handling piece, I remember something in that area being
committed and then reverted because it had issues. Does this version
fix those issues? (Assuming it's the same patch)
Yes. After the
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Fujii Masaomasao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Robert Haasrobertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:13 AM, Fujii Masaomasao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
The attached latest patch provides this capability. You can easily set
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Robert Haasrobertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
My preference for ease of CommitFest management would be one thread on
-hackers for each chunk that can be separately reviewed and committed.
So if there are three severable chunks here, send a patch for each
one
