Alvaro Herrera a écrit :
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Do we care to maintain a maximum width for programs' --help output (and
psql's
\?)? I think 79 characters was once a recommendation (or perhaps 72), but
we
have a couple of violations either way, which I'd like to fix, but what to?
79
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 06:56:06PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Do we care to maintain a maximum width for programs' --help output (and
psql's
\?)? I think 79 characters was once a recommendation (or perhaps 72), but
we
have a couple of violations either
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 16:04:46 -0500
Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do we care to maintain a maximum width for programs' --help output
(and psql's \?)? I think 79
On Nov 15, 2007 4:56 PM, Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Do we care to maintain a maximum width for programs' --help output (and
psql's
\?)? I think 79 characters was once a recommendation (or perhaps 72), but
we
have a couple of violations either way,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 21:58:28 +0100
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do we care to maintain a maximum width for programs' --help output
(and psql's \?)? I think 79 characters was once a recommendation (or
perhaps 72), but we have a couple
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Do we care to maintain a maximum width for programs' --help output (and
psql's
\?)? I think 79 characters was once a recommendation (or perhaps 72), but we
have a couple of violations either way, which I'd like to fix, but what to?
Yea, I went over with the pg_ctl
Do we care to maintain a maximum width for programs' --help output (and psql's
\?)? I think 79 characters was once a recommendation (or perhaps 72), but we
have a couple of violations either way, which I'd like to fix, but what to?
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 16:04:46 -0500
Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do we care to maintain a maximum width for programs' --help output
(and psql's \?)? I think 79 characters was once a recommendation
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Also it would rock if translation kept the alignment in various output.
Theoretically the translators are supposed to do that already ...
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Do we care to maintain a maximum width for programs' --help output (and psql's
\?)? I think 79 characters was once a recommendation (or perhaps 72), but we
have a couple of violations either way, which I'd like to fix, but what to?
Yea,
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do we care to maintain a maximum width for programs' --help output (and
psql's
\?)? I think 79 characters was once a recommendation (or perhaps 72), but we
have a couple of violations either way, which I'd like to fix, but what to?
I think 79 is
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Do we care to maintain a maximum width for programs' --help output (and
psql's
\?)? I think 79 characters was once a recommendation (or perhaps 72), but we
have a couple of violations either way, which I'd like to fix, but what to?
79 is perfect IMHO. It would be
12 matches
Mail list logo