I wrote:
> Adding to my suspicion is that I don't recall having seen one of these
> personally,
I take that back --- some digging in my mail logs shows that I have
gotten a few of these, but they went straight to /dev/null because
my spam filters thought they were a virus. Have you checked whethe
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 11:15:37AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> hoping to draw responses from careless people? I've heard of web
> comment-spammers who try to get other people to decode captchas
> for them this way.
Yes. This is the latest spammer trick. They get people all over the globe
to decode
Tom Lane wrote:
> Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > It's worse than that in this case. This is an *impressively* broken
> > configuration.
>
> Understatement of the week. The mail includes absolutely no evidence
> about what message is allegedly being filtered. Are you sure that
> th
Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's worse than that in this case. This is an *impressively* broken
> configuration.
Understatement of the week. The mail includes absolutely no evidence
about what message is allegedly being filtered. Are you sure that
this is really a filtering engin
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 01:09:39PM +, Gregory Stark wrote:
If I were the list maintainer here I would ban infotecnica.com.br addresses
from subscribing to any of our lists. Ideally with a message saying "as a
result of misconfigured mail software addreses from inf
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 01:09:39PM +, Gregory Stark wrote:
> If I were the list maintainer here I would ban infotecnica.com.br addresses
> from subscribing to any of our lists. Ideally with a message saying "as a
> result of misconfigured mail software addreses from infotecnica.com.br are
> ba
"Andrew Dunstan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Receipt of messages like this is guaranteed an immediate entry in my junk
> filter. Use of this braindead software is bad enough, but being so clueless as
> not to whitelist a technical mailing list you subscribe to is truly horrible.
It's worse than
Gregory Stark wrote:
I'm receiving bogus bounce messages like this (which are malformed even, the
Subject isn't properly encoded). I'm not sure what list is generating them or
what address but if we can figure out who could we drop whoever it is from the
list please?
---
I'm receiving bogus bounce messages like this (which are malformed even, the
Subject isn't properly encoded). I'm not sure what list is generating them or
what address but if we can figure out who could we drop whoever it is from the
list please?
--- Begin Message ---
A mensagem de email en
