On 09/03/2013 11:20 PM, Tomonari Katsumata wrote:
I understands that the PostgreSQL license does not require
any specified file name and missing LICENSE is not problem.
I'm Sorry for the stupid question.
No, thank *you* for pointing it out! None of us had actually looked at
that page.
--
Hi,
PostgreSQL is released under the PostgreSQL License.
http://www.postgresql.org/about/licence/
I've checked the PostgreSQL License,
and had a question.
http://opensource.org/licenses/PostgreSQL
It seems that the license requres a LICENSE file
in the target product
[quote]
Then put the
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Tomonari Katsumata
t.katsumata1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
PostgreSQL is released under the PostgreSQL License.
http://www.postgresql.org/about/licence/
I've checked the PostgreSQL License,
and had a question.
http://opensource.org/licenses/PostgreSQL
It
On 09/03/2013 11:16 AM, Tomonari Katsumata wrote:
It seems the contents of the COPYRIGTH file are all required by the
license.
So I have confused why PostgreSQL has a COPYRIGHT file instead of
LICENSE.
Anybody knows the reason?
And is this non problem thing?
The first paragraph on the OSI
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Tomonari Katsumata
t.katsumata1...@gmail.com wrote:
PostgreSQL is released under the PostgreSQL License.
http://www.postgresql.org/about/licence/
The actual license terms can be found in the COPYRIGHT file in our
I've checked the PostgreSQL License,
and had a question.
http://opensource.org/licenses/PostgreSQL
I don't know who opensource.org are, but their idea of the PostgreSQL
license doesn't appear to match the actual license text.
The OSI, which is the organization which defines whether
(2013/09/04 2:34), Josh Berkus wrote:
I've checked the PostgreSQL License,
and had a question.
http://opensource.org/licenses/PostgreSQL
I don't know who opensource.org are, but their idea of the PostgreSQL
license doesn't appear to match the actual license text.
The OSI, which is the
