Re: [HACKERS] Third call for platform testing (linux 2.4.x)

2001-03-31 Thread Nathan Myers
I just built and tested RC1 on Linux 2.4.2, with glibc-2.2.2 and gcc-2.95.2 on a Debian 2.2+ x86 system. ("+" implying some packages from "unstable".) I configured it --with-perl --with-openssl --with-CXX. It built without errors, but with a few warnings. This one seemed (portably) odd: --

Re: [HACKERS] Third call for platform testing (linux 2.4.x)

2001-03-30 Thread Thomas Lockhart
> I still don't see an entry for Linux 2.4.x My (uncommitted) updates to the real list show 2.4.2 in the comments section. I may remove all mention of versions, since it seems that most released versions of x86 Linux run PostgreSQL successfully. Comments? - Thomas > > Un

Re: [HACKERS] Third call for platform testing (linux 2.4.x)

2001-03-30 Thread Mathijs Brands
On Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 12:02:35PM +1200, Franck Martin allegedly wrote: > I still don't see an entry for Linux 2.4.x > > Cheers. This should fix that: == All 76 tests passed. == rm regress.o make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/exp/tmp/postgresql-7.1RC1/sr

Re: [HACKERS] Third call for platform testing (linux 2.4.x)

2001-03-30 Thread Franck Martin
I still don't see an entry for Linux 2.4.x Cheers. Thomas Lockhart wrote: > Unreported or problem platforms: > > Linux 2.0.x MIPS 7.0 2000-04-13 (Tatsuo has lost machine) > mklinux PPC750 7.0 2000-04-13, Tatsuo Ishii > NetBSD m68k7.0 2000-04-10 (Henry has lost machine) > NetBSD Sp