Re: [HACKERS] Thread-safe configuration option appears to misfunction

2003-08-04 Thread Bruce Momjian
OK, I fixed a number of problems in configure with threads --- please give it a try now. Thanks. --- Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > Is it intended that libpq is always c

Re: [HACKERS] Thread-safe configuration option appears to misfunction

2003-08-04 Thread Bruce Momjian
We decided to make separate thread/nonthread libraries if the threading requires any special flags --- we haven't done that yet, and only configure controls it. --- Larry Rosenman wrote: > > > --On Monday, August 04, 2003

Re: [HACKERS] Thread-safe configuration option appears to misfunction

2003-08-04 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Bruce Momjian writes: > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > Is it intended that libpq is always compiled with the so-called > > "thread-safe" compiler option, regardless of whether I used > > --enable-thread-thing? > > It certainly should not be doing that, but my OS has no thread flags, so > I am not see

Re: [HACKERS] Thread-safe configuration option appears to misfunction

2003-08-04 Thread Bruce Momjian
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Is it intended that libpq is always compiled with the so-called > "thread-safe" compiler option, regardless of whether I used > --enable-thread-thing? It certainly should not be doing that, but my OS has no thread flags, so I am not seeing it here. What exactly do you se

[HACKERS] Thread-safe configuration option appears to misfunction

2003-08-04 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Is it intended that libpq is always compiled with the so-called "thread-safe" compiler option, regardless of whether I used --enable-thread-thing? -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe com