On March 18, 2002 06:12 pm, Bruce Momjian wrote:
OK, I have branded 7.2.1 and updated HISTORY/release.sgml. Do we want
any special text about the sequence bug fix, or just mention in the
announcement that all 7.2 people should upgrade?
Does this mean that I can start putting fixes and
D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
On March 18, 2002 06:12 pm, Bruce Momjian wrote:
OK, I have branded 7.2.1 and updated HISTORY/release.sgml. Do we want
any special text about the sequence bug fix, or just mention in the
announcement that all 7.2 people should upgrade?
Does this mean that I can
Oleg Bartunov wrote:
Bruce,
we have something to add. It's quite important for users of our tsearch module.
Too late ?
For 7.2.1, I don't think it is too late but I don't think we can wait
days.
--
Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Oleg Bartunov wrote:
Bruce,
we have something to add. It's quite important for users of our tsearch module.
Too late ?
For 7.2.1, I don't think it is too late but I don't think we can wait
days.
I'll do a wrap on Friday, if Oleg wants to get
Oleg Bartunov wrote:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Oleg Bartunov wrote:
Bruce,
we have something to add. It's quite important for users of our tsearch module.
Too late ?
For 7.2.1, I don't think it is too late but I don't think we can wait
days.
Don't wait.
OK, patch applied to 7.2.1 only --- no need to have that mentioned in
7.3 README.tsearch. HISTORY/release.sgml updated in both branches:
contrib/tsearch dictionary improvements, see README.tsearch for
an additional installation step (Thomas T. Thai, Teodor Sigaev)
OK, I have branded 7.2.1 and updated HISTORY/release.sgml. Do we want
any special text about the sequence bug fix, or just mention in the
announcement that all 7.2 people should upgrade?
---
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OK, I have branded 7.2.1 and updated HISTORY/release.sgml. Do we want
any special text about the sequence bug fix, or just mention in the
announcement that all 7.2 people should upgrade?
The first change item should maybe be more explicit, say
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OK, I have branded 7.2.1 and updated HISTORY/release.sgml. Do we want
any special text about the sequence bug fix, or just mention in the
announcement that all 7.2 people should upgrade?
The first change item should maybe be more
I believe we've now committed fixes for all the must fix items there
were for 7.2.1. Does anyone have any reasons to hold up 7.2.1 more,
or are we ready to go?
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if
Tom Lane wrote:
I believe we've now committed fixes for all the must fix items there
were for 7.2.1. Does anyone have any reasons to hold up 7.2.1 more,
or are we ready to go?
I need to brand 7.2.1 --- will do tomorrow.
--
Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us
is there any further word on 7.2.1, at this point? haven't seen mention
of it on the list in a while? is it still waiting on something big?
-tfo
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Applied to current and 7.2.X. Thanks.
(No delay for /contrib commits from maintainers.)
---(end
Thomas F. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
is there any further word on 7.2.1, at this point? haven't seen mention
of it on the list in a while? is it still waiting on something big?
Well, we were gonna release it last weekend, but now it's waiting on
sequence fixes (currently being
Thomas Lockhart [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It is somewhat complicated by the fact that my code tree is pretty
massively changed in this area as I implement an int64-based date/time
storage alternative to the float64 scheme we use now. The alternative
would be enabled with something like #ifdef
14 matches
Mail list logo
