Neil Conway wrote:
Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Saturday 16 November 2002 01:07, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
OK sorry - I was under the impression that core == commit bit...
committers != core
Is there any reason for this distinction?
I assume you are asking why there
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Lockhart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 November 2002 06:38
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [HACKERS] Time to move on...
Just a quick note to mention that I've resigned from the PostgreSQL
steering committee. It has been a lot of fun
Christopher Kings-Lynne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To the rest of the hackers, is it normal practice to perhaps vote in a new
member of the steering committee?
Uh ... it's never happened before ... so there is no normal practice.
regards, tom lane
Hey Thomas,
Although we have never corresponded, I just wanted to say thank you to
yourself and all the other hackers who have devoted their time voluntarily to
PostgreSQL. It really is appreciated.
Cheers
Mark Pritchard
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 17:38, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
Just a quick note to
Tom Lane wrote:
Christopher Kings-Lynne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To the rest of the hackers, is it normal practice to perhaps vote in a new
member of the steering committee?
Uh ... it's never happened before ... so there is no normal practice.
The logic usually has been to add people to
On Friday 15 November 2002 01:38, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
Just a quick note to mention that I've resigned from the PostgreSQL
steering committee. It has been a lot of fun and very rewarding to
participate in PostgreSQL development over the last six years, but it is
time to take a break and to
On Friday 15 November 2002 10:23, Tom Lane wrote:
Christopher Kings-Lynne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To the rest of the hackers, is it normal practice to perhaps vote in a
new member of the steering committee?
Uh ... it's never happened before ... so there is no normal practice.
IMHO,
Lamar Owen wrote:
On Friday 15 November 2002 10:23, Tom Lane wrote:
Christopher Kings-Lynne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To the rest of the hackers, is it normal practice to perhaps vote in a
new member of the steering committee?
Uh ... it's never happened before ... so there is no
I will reiterate for the new folks that the core group doesn't do much
more than decide if the final release will be on a Friday or a Monday,
and deal with private issues like discipline. I think we deal with such
issues perhaps 2-4 times a year.
OK sorry - I was under the impression that
On Saturday 16 November 2002 01:07, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
I will reiterate for the new folks that the core group doesn't do much
more than decide if the final release will be on a Friday or a Monday,
and deal with private issues like discipline. I think we deal with such
issues
Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Saturday 16 November 2002 01:07, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
OK sorry - I was under the impression that core == commit bit...
committers != core
Is there any reason for this distinction?
Cheers,
Neil
--
Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] || PGP Key
Just a quick note to mention that I've resigned from the PostgreSQL
steering committee. It has been a lot of fun and very rewarding to
participate in PostgreSQL development over the last six years, but it is
time to take a break and to move on to other projects.
Thanks to Marc, Bruce, and
Just a quick note to mention that I've resigned from the PostgreSQL
steering committee. It has been a lot of fun and very rewarding to
participate in PostgreSQL development over the last six years, but it is
time to take a break and to move on to other projects.
Thanks for all your work,
Thomas Lockhart wrote:
Just a quick note to mention that I've resigned from the PostgreSQL
steering committee.
Wow. That was totally unexpected.
A sad day. :-/
It has been a lot of fun and very rewarding to
participate in PostgreSQL development over the last six years, but it is
time
14 matches
Mail list logo
