Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> so the text of the message is surely not what they are really
>> complaining about? Or is the compiler broken?
> I'll ask, it is Beta (although the Compiler has done this since the C99
> functionality was added, and it causes a LOT of open source stuff
Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Without specifying the -Xb switch to kill the C99 interpretation of
> inline, I get the following from current CVS:
> UX:acomp: ERROR: "tuplesort.c", line 1854: "inline" functions cannot use
> "static" identifier: myFunctionCall2
I don't understand wha
Without specifying the -Xb switch to kill the C99 interpretation of
inline, I get the following from current CVS:
UX:acomp: ERROR: "tuplesort.c", line 1854: "inline" functions cannot use
"static" identifier: myFunctionCall2
UX:acomp: ERROR: "tuplesort.c", line 1856: "inline" functions cannot use
"
