On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 8:05 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Paquier writes:
>> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> It's interesting that you bring this up. I've also wondered why we
>>> don't use random TLIs. I suppose I'm internally assuming that it's
>>> because the people
Michael Paquier writes:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> It's interesting that you bring this up. I've also wondered why we
>> don't use random TLIs. I suppose I'm internally assuming that it's
>> because the people who wrote the code are far more brilliant and
>> knowle
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Brian Faherty
> wrote:
>> I was working with replication and recovery the other day and noticed that
>> there were scenarios where I could cause multiple servers to enter the same
>> timeline while possibly
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Brian Faherty
wrote:
> Hey hackers,
> I was working with replication and recovery the other day and noticed that
> there were scenarios where I could cause multiple servers to enter the same
> timeline while possibly having divergent data. One such scenario is M
Hey hackers,
I was working with replication and recovery the other day and noticed
that there were scenarios where I could cause multiple servers to enter the
same timeline while possibly having divergent data. One such scenario is
Master A and Replica B are both on timeline 1. There is an event
