Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging of heap_mark4update

2005-01-16 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, Tom Lane wrote: Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hackers, In access/heap/heapam.c, in heap_mark4update(), there's a comment that states /* * XLOG stuff: no logging is required as long as we have no * savepoints. For savepoints private log

Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging of heap_mark4update

2005-01-16 Thread Tom Lane
Heikki Linnakangas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, Tom Lane wrote: Right. The 2PC connection is another reason to do it that way --- 2PC would require some way to save locks anyhow, and it'd be nice if there were only one mechanism to deal with not two. AFAICS,

Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging of heap_mark4update

2005-01-15 Thread Tom Lane
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hackers, In access/heap/heapam.c, in heap_mark4update(), there's a comment that states /* * XLOG stuff: no logging is required as long as we have no * savepoints. For savepoints private log could be used... */ Is this