Just a confirmation.
Do you plan overwrite storage manager also in 7.2 ?
Yes if I'll get enough time.
Vadim
I'm still nervous about how we're going to test the WAL code
adequately for the lesser-used index types. Any ideas out there?
First, seems we'll have to follow to what you've proposed for
their redo/undo: log each *fact* of changing a page to know
was update op done entirely or not (rebuild
* Mikheev, Vadim [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001016 09:33] wrote:
I don't understand why WAL needs to log internal operations of any of
the index types. Seems to me that you could treat indexes as black
boxes that are updated as side effects of WAL log items for heap tuples:
when adding a heap tuple
"Mikheev, Vadim" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't understand why WAL needs to log internal operations of any of
the index types. Seems to me that you could treat indexes as black
boxes that are updated as side effects of WAL log items for heap tuples:
when adding a heap tuple as a result of
* Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001016 09:47] wrote:
"Mikheev, Vadim" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't understand why WAL needs to log internal operations of any of
the index types. Seems to me that you could treat indexes as black
boxes that are updated as side effects of WAL log items
"Mikheev, Vadim" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And how could I use such records on recovery
being unable to know what data columns represent
keys, what functions should be used for ordering?
Um, that's not built into the index either, is it? OK, you win ...
I'm still nervous about how we're
One of the purposes of WAL is immediate removing tuples
inserted by aborted xactions. I want make VACUUM
*optional* in future - space must be available for
reusing without VACUUM. And this is first, very small,
step in this direction.
Why would vacuum become optional? Would WAL offer an
"Mikheev, Vadim" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And how could I use such records on recovery
being unable to know what data columns represent
keys, what functions should be used for ordering?
Um, that's not built into the index either, is it? OK, you win ...
I'm still nervous about how
On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, Vadim Mikheev wrote:
Well, hopefully WAL will be ready for alpha testing in a few days.
Unfortunately
at the moment I have to step side from main stream to implement new file
naming,
the biggest todo for integration WAL into system.
I would really appreciate any help
Well, hopefully WAL will be ready for alpha testing in a few
days.
Unfortunately at the moment I have to step side from main stream
to implement new file naming, the biggest todo for integration
WAL into system.
I would really appreciate any help in
Well, hopefully WAL will be ready for alpha testing in a few days.
Unfortunately
at the moment I have to step side from main stream to implement new file
naming,
the biggest todo for integration WAL into system.
I would really appreciate any help in the following issues (testing can
start
11 matches
Mail list logo
