Re: [HACKERS] WIP: AuthenticationMD5 protocol documentation clarification

2011-10-13 Thread Bruce Momjian
Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > On 06.06.2011 16:58, Robert Haas wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Cyan Ogilvie > > wrote: > >> This is my first patch, so I hope I've got the process right for submitting > >> patches. > > > > You're doing great. I suspect we do want to either (1) reword wh

Re: [HACKERS] WIP: AuthenticationMD5 protocol documentation clarification

2011-06-06 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
On 06.06.2011 16:58, Robert Haas wrote: On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Cyan Ogilvie wrote: This is my first patch, so I hope I've got the process right for submitting patches. You're doing great. I suspect we do want to either (1) reword what you've done in English, rather than writing it

Re: [HACKERS] WIP: AuthenticationMD5 protocol documentation clarification

2011-06-06 Thread Robert Haas
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Cyan Ogilvie wrote: > This is my first patch, so I hope I've got the process right for submitting > patches. You're doing great. I suspect we do want to either (1) reword what you've done in English, rather than writing it as code, or at least (2) add some SGML m

[HACKERS] WIP: AuthenticationMD5 protocol documentation clarification

2011-06-06 Thread Cyan Ogilvie
This is my first patch, so I hope I've got the process right for submitting patches. I'm building a driver to talk version 3.0 of the protocol, and generally I've found the documentation to be excellent. One are I had trouble with was responding to the AuthenticationMD5Password challenge. After