Hi Tom,
It now works like a charm!
Many thanks.
Best regards,
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
> Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 14:00:37 -0400
> From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
> Cc: pgsql-hackers list
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Warthog failing
>
ohp@pyrenet.fr writes:
> Since last night, Warthog build farm member (unixware) is failing the
> returning regression test.
Mea culpa --- the regression test was unintentionally displaying
processing-order-dependent behavior, by joining an updated row to
more than one row of another table. Should
Hi all,
Since last night, Warthog build farm member (unixware) is failing the
returning regression test.
Regression.diffs is :
*** ./expected/returning.outSat Aug 12 04:52:06 2006
--- ./results/returning.out Sun Aug 13 14:51:07 2006
***
*** 155,162
WHERE foo.f1 = i.q1
